Resumo Os cimentos endodônticos devem conter ótima adesão à dentina radicular, baixa citotoxicidade, radiopacidade suficiente e estabilidade dimensional elevada, que dependem principalmente da sua composição química. Os objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar a composição química de Syntex (Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Polônia), Adseal (Meta Biomed, Cheongju-si, Coreia), Sealapex (SybronEndo, Scafati, Itália), MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brasil) e GuttaFlow Bioseal (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Suíça) e determinar comparativamente a sua radiopacidade. Foram construídos moldes de aço inoxidável com um diâmetro interior de 5 mm e uma profundidade de 2 mm. Os cimentos testados foram misturados e vertidos em moldes. Após a fixação, foram feitas radiografias periapicais digitais dos espécimes (n=12) em condições de exposição padrão e os valores médios de cinza dos espécimes foram medidos utilizando um programa de computação gráfica. Em seguida, as amostras foram examinadas por microscopia eletrônica de varredura, e foi realizada uma análise de raios X dispersiva de energia. Os dados foram analisados utilizando a ANOVA unidirecional seguida do teste de comparação múltipla Holm-Sidak (p = 0,05). O Sealapex mostrou um pico de cálcio mais elevado do que os cimentos MTA Fillapex, GuttaFlow Bioseal, Adseal e Syntex. O MTA Fillapex continha uma quantidade mais elevada de tungstato. O Sealapex apresentou o maior valor de radiopacidade entre os materiais testados (p < 0,05), enquanto que a MTA Fillapex foi o material menos radiopaco (p < 0,05). Cada cimento endodôntico contém diferentes composições de radiopacificadores incluindo óxido de bismuto, tungstato de cálcio e óxido de zircônio. Os cimentos testados apresentaram valores de radiopacidade acima do limite especificado pela ISO. Sealapex foi o cimento obturador mais radiopaco seguido por GuttaFlow Bioseal, Syntex, Adseal e MTA Fillapex.

Abstract Root canal sealers should have optimum adhesion to the root dentin, low cytotoxicity, sufficient radiopacity and high dimensional stability, which depend mainly on their chemical composition. The aims of this study were to evaluate the chemical composition of Syntex (Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland), Adseal (Meta Biomed, Cheongju-si, Korea), Sealapex (SybronEndo, Scafati, Italy), MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) and GuttaFlow Bioseal (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) and to determine their radiopacity comparatively. Stainless steel molds with an inner diameter of 5 mm and a depth of 2 mm were constructed. Tested root-canal sealers were mixed and poured into the molds. Following setting, digital periapical radiographs of the specimens (n=12) were taken under standard exposure conditions and the mean gray-values of specimens were measured using a computer graphics program. Then the specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy, and Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak multi-comparison test (p = 0.05). Sealapex showed higher calcium peak than MTA Fillapex, GuttaFlow Bioseal, Adseal and Syntex sealers. MTA Fillapex contained a highest amount of tungstate. Sealapex presented the highest radiopacity value among the tested materials (p < 0.05), whereas MTA Fillapex was the least radiopaque material (p < 0.05). Each root canal sealer contains different compositions of radiopacifiers including bismuth oxide, calcium tungstate and zirconium oxide. The tested root canal sealers had radiopacity values above the ISO-specified limit. Sealapex was the most radiopaque root canal sealer followed by GuttaFlow Bioseal, Syntex, Adseal and MTA Fillapex.

Abstract Objective: To qualitatively investigate whether a prototype brush composed of metal bristles collects oral epithelial cells effectively for cytological evaluation of oral mucosal lesions. Material and Methods: Twenty patients with suspicious oral mucosal lesions were enrolled. Patients were asked to gargle with saline and to deposit the oral rinse into specimen cup. Then, oral mucosal cell samples were collected using a metal oral brush, via sweeping motion. Punch biopsy was performed for histological examination. All samples were evaluated with liquid based cytology (LBC) according to the cellularity, the depth of the epithelial layer, cellular integrity by an oral pathologist. Results: Oral rinse provided samples with 100% cellular integrity and cellularity, mostly from the intermediary layers. With metal brush, both inadequate cellularity and cellular integrity was observed in 25% of the cases. Cellular integrity was adequate in 65%, cellularity was adequate in 45% of the lesions. Samples were dominantly from the intermediary layers, but in one case, metal brush collected cells from the parabasal layer. Conclusion: The narrow spiral pitch and width of metal bristles may have resisted to release the cellular samples collected. With adjustment of the spiral pitch and diameter of metal brush bristles, its’ efficacy could be enhanced.

OBJECTIVES: To produce a copper (Cu) stepwedge with aluminum (Al) equivalent mean gray values (MGV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The thicknesses of Cu steps that were equivalent to those of the Al were formulated using the X-ray attenuation properties of the materials. The Al and fabricated Cu stepwedges were radiographed, but the MGVs of the Cu stepwedge were mismatching to those of the Al. Using a mathematical function to adjust the pixel MGV of Cu stepwedge to those of the Al, new Cu stepwedges were created. In vitro iterations were performed until best approximation to Al was reached. RESULTS: The MGV of the Cu stepwedges fabricated by formularization were different than those of Al (p=0.001). Iteration method led to MGV similar to those of the Al stepwedge (p=0.207). CONCLUSIONS: Construction of a Cu stepwedge according to the basic rules of radiophysic failed to result in a stepwedge with similar radiodensity values to those of Al stepwedge. Further studies may use the formularization method only for prototype Cu wedge production, but consecutive iterations shall be compassed to obtain the best approximation to Al MGV.